PEER GRADES
By Rachel Lancaster
Jakub Garbacz
word count: 1,847
24/25
The paper was well put together. He showed a variety of ethos, logos, and pathos. I liked how he used past, present, and future as well. Adding historical facts and ideas gave the paper alot more credibility. I like the fact that at the end you stated "One doesn’t have to be skilled to create an art, although skills usually help us to achieve main goal of an art: to cause an emotional response, and to affect people’s feelings and opinions, although it not always is a rule." This statement i agree with and stood out to me at the most. I love to make art, although I am not good at it at all. Overall, the paper was very good and I only took one point off because he did not meet the word requirement.
Jaime Grullon
word count: 1,800
24/25
I chose to give Jaime a 24 because of only the word count. I really enjoyed reading something that I actually agree with. Jaime seemed to dislike labels in politics, and so do I. Politics split people over stupid reasons. Instead of being "united", we obsesse over who we "are." I really get that idea that Jaime presses. Jaime had alot of pathos, and a good amount of logos and ethos. There were questions posed and answers to most, thus an overall interesting and well written paper.
Suraj Jani
word count: 2,386
25/25
Suraj's paper was my favorite. He used an abundant amount of ethos, logos, and pathos. I am a very spiritual person and I get alot of my ideas and beliefs from the Bible and I give alot of credit to people who do the same even if it is not my faith. I have ready the Baghavad Gita and I think that using that in the paper gave it a real "meaning." The paper was very well written and had a lot of passion. The word count was met, and the grammatical aspect was great. Overall it probably could not have been any better.
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.